Wednesday, 20 April 2016

Scene 3

Scene 3:
For what two reasons does Desdemona agree to plead Cassio's case?
Cassio has explained the whole situation to Desdemona, and she promises to not rest until she's convinced Othello to grant Cassio's acceptance back into the military as well as Othello's personal friendship. Cassio declares he's forever indebted to her, and Desdemona again emphasizes that she'll do everything she can. This is because she likes Cassio and believes him to be a man of honour, she thinks that she has the compassionate ear of Othello and is oblivious to Iago’s evil intention.
What is Iago referring to when he says, "Ha! I like not that."
Iago is attempting to peak Othello’s curiosity in relation to what Desdemona and Cassio have been having such an intimate conversation about. By making it a negative act with Iago’s apparent dislike towards witnessing it worries Othello.
After Othello repeatedly urges Iago to tell him what's on his mind, Iago says "O, beware, my lord, of jealousy;/It is the green eyed monster, which doth mock / The meat it feeds on." What is Othello's response? What does he want from Iago?
Othello responds with ‘O misery!’ as he gradually loses his potential to converse. He wants Iago to reveal what he knows/what evidence he has of Desdemona’s unfaithfulness – he has fallen out of certainty in relation to his wife’s loyalty in 80 lines.
What does Iago say about the women of Venice?
Iago implies women are secretive and want to have sex with a myriad of different men. He claims only God truly knows what every woman gets up to through ‘in Venice they do let God see the pranks’. He also states it’s better to keep the truth unknown as women will just break your heart and cheat on you.
What contextual evidence do we have to support Iago's views of Venetian women?
Contextually the women of Venice are supposed to have been locked in their houses by their husbands as if they were able to roam the streets it would be inevitable that another man would have sex with your wife.
Why might this cause Othello to believe this or, at least, not dismiss it immediately?
This contextual evidence causes Othello’s suspicions to be increased as he is aware of the stereotype of Venetian women. He fears this stereotype may be true as he has heard of the ideology previously.
Who echoes Brabantio's earlier warning to Othello?
Iago by saying ‘she did deceive her father, marrying you’ and ‘to seel her father’s eyes up close as oak’ he refers to how Desdemona lied to her father and so would be quite capable of lying to Othello.
In his duplicitous fashion, what bold statement does Iago make about Desdemona and Othello?


Iago claims their relationship is unnatural and Desdemona was always destined to find a spouse ‘of her own clime, complexion and degree’. This shows duplicity as he doesn’t really believe this, it is him that has enforced the turmoil of their relationship to occur, not because the match of the couple is unnatural due to race.
Desdemona's handkerchief becomes an important piece of stage business. Why did Desdemona produce it? What happens to it? What might this symbolise? What happens to it? What does Emilia plan to do with it?
Since the handkerchief was the first gift Desdemona received from Othello, she keeps it about her constantly as a symbol of Othello's love. Iago manipulates the handkerchief so that Othello comes to see it as a symbol of Desdemona herself—her faith and chastity.
What do you think motivates Emilia to take the handkerchief to Iago?
Emilia believes her husband may want to get her a similar handkerchief made to show his love and devotion – she desires this so she gives it to him.
What does Iago plan to do with the handkerchief?
Iago plans to use the handkerchief as evidence of Cassio and Desdemona’s apparent love as Othello’s first gift to her is now being wiped on Cassio’s beard = disrespect.
When Othello returns to the scene upset, what warning does he give Iago?
Warns him his death will follow shortly.
What 'proof' of Desdemona's disloyalty does Iago give Othello?
Claims he was awake with toothache and Cassio began sleep talking about Desdemona and the love they share, then he begun humping his leg implying he had done the same to Othello’s spouse as a result.
What is Iago's final 'proof'?
His final proof is that Cassio now has Othello’s first gift to Desdemona which shows her betrayal of giving away an item of such great importance.
What is noticeable about Othello's language in this scene? 
Othello loses his ability to speak within the scene and begins to respond monosyllabically and often with grunts and not even words, for example ‘O, blood, blood, blood!’



Thursday, 11 February 2016

Othello Act 1 Scene 1-3 questions

Othello Act 1 Scene 1
Thoughts on Othello after Act 1 Scene 1 – he’s a different race to all other characters, hence the repeated use of racial colloquialism ‘moor’. He is also referred to in a racist manor such as by his ‘thick-lips’ and ‘old black ram’. It is implied by Iago that Othello is a thief (‘thieves’) who has stolen Brabantio’s daughter. Othello is perceived to be a man of magic by Brabanio’s instant reaction in reference to witchcraft – ‘is there not charms’, highlighting how truly absurd it would be for his daughter to willingly fall in love with a black moor. Lastly, Othello is depicted to be a threat to society who needs to be eliminated due to the amassing of ‘weapons’ needed to approach this monster.
We believe Iago due to his multitude of speeches in which his tone and intonation of delivery are persuasive. He provides valid reasoning for the audience to understand his reasoning as he explains how he’s displeased about Cassio being made lieutenant when he has no knowledge of battle. Othello’s name remains unmentioned in this act but it is this black ‘moor’ who is the General of the Army who chose this to occur. Iago appears a more sensible and sophisticated character to believe as opposed to Roderigo’s drunken, short lines.
Brabantio reacts with such dismay as socially it would be highly frowned upon for a black (older) man to take a younger, innocent white girl to be his spouse. Brabantio is outraged at the mere thought of this action due to the objectification of women in the 16th century – he ‘owns’ Desdemona hence the use of ‘thieves’ highlighting how a possession of his has been snatched without his knowing. Due to racial inequalities his immediate reaction is to blame ‘charms’ as the only logical explanation for this monstrosity to occur, as he is so adamant his daughter would not choose this herself.
Iago highlights what is ‘wrong’ with Michael Cassio on lines 17-27. For example, “a great arithmetician” implies Cassio is more Scholar like than an actual solider, hence why he shouldn’t have been promoted above Iago in his eyes.  This is further emphasised by the quote “Mere Prattle without practise” Iago here is saying that Cassio is all talk and no action.
Iago is depicted to be the perfect Venetain man (28-39) as he highlights his previous victories in battle in ‘Rhodes, Cyprus, and on other grounds’ showing his great qualities as a soldier, as he helped the state of Venice.
Brabantio thinks Othello has won Desdemona (168-173) through ‘charms’ and witchcraft. (see above).
We may doubt Iago’s honesty by the end of this scene as Iago quickly leaves the scene right before an angry Brabantio and his men to enter the stage. This occurs directly after they have been rudely awakened in the dead of night. Why is Iago so keen to quickly escape is he truly thinks he’s doing Brabantio a favour?
Othello Act 1 Scene 2
The introduction of Othello is this scene changes the current image of him depicted in the first scene. He is not the threat to society Brabantio suggests he is – for examples his first line ‘Tis better as it is’ merely seeks peace despite Iago’s harsh words in relation to murder. Othello’s entrance brings light, whereas the introduction of Iago shown him to be shrouded in darkness – this is ironic as his hubris disallows him to see Iago for what he truly is. Othello’s high ranking position within society is exemplified in this scene, firstly due to his intelligence as he is aware of how his marriage will be received; reminding us of his royal blood. Unlike Iago Othello is an eloquent character as he speaks in verse; highlighting his sophistication and confidence, he uses lexical field to further promote his authority. Othello is greeted with respect by Cassio as he greets him (‘The Duke does greet you, General’). Othello’s worth to society is again emphasised as ‘the senate hath sent about three several quests ‘in attempt to find him. Othello remains unconcerned and still remains calm.
Othello responds to Iago’s baiting (or agenda setting) in a calm and civilised manor on lines 1-17. Iago over exaggerates the situation in attempt to make Othello fearful but Othello’s intelligence and reason keep him calm and cause him to desire only one thing; peace. This is highlighted through Othello’s lines ‘Tis better as it is’.
When Brabantio meets Othello (62-99) he reacts with great anger. He immediately addresses Othello as a ‘foul thief’ and refers to him as the devil in Shakespearian times due to ‘damned’. He goes on to imply that Othello has bewitched his daughter in ‘chains on magic’, again emphasising his implication of Othello being a creature similar to the devil. As religion was of incredible importance to everyone in society contextually, this would be incredibly offensive. Brabantio contrasts Othello with the idealised image of a man that his daughter should desire – a ‘wealthy curled darling of our nation’ not a ‘sooty bosom’. Again, this racial slur diminishes Othello purely because of his race, his soul is not considered anything of worthy quality – for it is that that Desdemona loves so greatly.
Othello reacts to Brabantio’s charges (59-91) calmly. Even after Brabantio and his men dominate the stage Othello states that they should just talk and not fight, even seconds from death he is extremely confident as he states ‘keep up your bright swords, for the dew will rust them’. Othello has a clear conscience and honourable nature, shown through his calm actions and request for the opportunity to answer the charges made against him – ‘to answer this your charge’.
Othello Act 1 Scene 3 (45-225)                                                                               
The Duke and senators speak of Othello in racial language, but they also highlight his determination. For example the first senator addresses Othello as ‘the valiant moor’. The duke continues to use the word ‘valiant’ to describe Othello, contrasting Iago’s earlier depiction of him.  The senator refers to Othello as "Moor", which immediately isolates him. He doesn't need to be referred to by his name as Brabantio is, as there are no other Moors. The Duke's utterance (valiant) shows how important Othello is to the Venesian cause: without a word of greeting, he jumps to their need to ‘straight employ’ him against the ‘Ottoman’.
Brabantio speaks of his daughter (58-106) hyperbolically again. His grief is so immense that it feeds upon other sorrows and remains the same, and is a ‘flood-gate and o'erbearning nature’. He uses a semantic field of witchcraft; ‘spells’ ‘medicines’ and ’mountebanks’ (seller of magical goods). The idea of Desdemona being a possession that can be "stol'n" is also emphasised here. He suggests there is something 'unnatural' in the pairing of her and Othello, ‘nature so preposterously to err’.
We learn of the contextual views towards foreigners/moors within this section.  Brabantio for example assumes with no evidence that a black face is ‘what she feared to look on’ (98). He is blinded by his own prejudices, and he ascribes them to Desdemona, illuminating his ideology that his daughter who could not possibly fall in love with a black man. His reasoning here arises due to racism. Intimate relationships between different races are evil and entered into by good people through witchcraft. His daughter is good and shares his views; therefore, she was forced into this relationship with Othello by witchcraft. Othello also tells the story of his life, perhaps giving reasoning as to why the white dominated community are against him being with a white woman. He states how he was a fighter since his early years, he was ‘taken by the insolent foe / And sold to slavery’ (136). Shakespeare makes Othello's story rich in visual detail, but he makes it unclear where the events occurred, distorting geographic facts for dramatic effect. Slave trading was part of general trade along the shipping routes of East and North Africa, and many slaves were sold in markets in the cities of the Middle East. 
Considering the previous line, ‘rude’ (referring to simplistic) seems ironic. This is because Othello's elaborate speech is anything but simple. As we discover later, it was his ability to tell the story of his life that impressed Desdemona. This line can perhaps be seen as a foreshadowing of his tragic flaw; the unconscious belief in his self-deficiency.
Othello shows his loyalty and trust towards Desdemona. He wagers his ‘life’ on her honest word. This is also ironic and foreshadows the end of the play as both him and Desdemona die as a result of Othello’s belief that Desdemona has been dishonest and unfaithful. It is also startling he lets Desdemona speak on his behalf as she is a woman, who should not be listened to in such an important scenario such as the Senate. This is a man’s scene.
During Othello’s speech to Senate, he tells various stories relating to the time he has spent with Desdemona. Othello describes the course his romance took. Desdemona played an active role in the wooing, in ‘She'ld come again’ it shows that she came to him, rather than the typical male approaching the female. Othello begins to repeat himself (She swore, in faith, twas strange, 'twas passing strange,'Twas pitiful, 'twas wondrous pitiful) breaking the flow, as though Othello has lost himself for the moment in nostalgia, showing again the purity of his love, unlike Iago's suggestion.  The repetition of ‘strange’ hints at Othello’s self-deficiency and the idea of the ‘strange’ seems to suggest that looking back, he can't quite believe events fell out as they did.
Othello Act 1 Scene 3 (226-386)
The senators listen to Desdemona  as she attempts to persuade them to allow her to accompany him into the war as a faithful wife. Hence ‘. . . [I]f I be left behind, / A moth of peace, and he go to the war, / The rites for which I love him are bereft me, / And I a heavy interim shall support, / By his dear absence. Let me go with him" (255-259).  Desdemona longs to be with her husband, for the rites of marriage, for sexual intimacy, and she finishes with a direct request: ‘let me go with him’.
The Duke notes to Brabantio, Othello ‘is far more fair than black’ this praises Othello but is also a simultaneously racist comment.
Brabantio uses the rhyming couplet ‘Look to her, Moor, have a quick eye to see: / She has deceiv'd her father, may do thee.’ (292-293). These words to Othello in this scene are of high importantance. They are ironic and provide an example of dramatic presaging. Desdemona does not deceive Othello, but in short time Othello will be so convinced that she has deceived him that he will murder her. Othello's reply to Brabantio is likewise ironic: He vows, ‘my life upon her faith!’ (295). Shortly, he will in fact take his own life because of his lack of faith in her faith.
Roderigo is so distraught as he believes he is so deeply in love with Desdemona. Iago attempts to convince him to keep going by using masculinity as a weapon against him. Iago mocks Roderigo in response to his comment about not being able to live without Desdemona (‘when death is our physician’) by comparing him to a horny animal (baboon) to gain the audience’s humour. He effectively tells him to ‘man up’ from a modern day perspective as a respected man would rather have a multitude of women rather than just the one. Iago appeals towards the inner sexual nature of Roderigo through his speech – he disregards emotion and takes a more primal, animalistic stance on attitudes towards women. According to Iago, bodies are built for one thing: sex. He advices Roderigo to sleep with beautiful women (‘lettuce’) or horrible women (‘nettles’) for it does not matter, he can have a taste of the whole ‘gender of herbs’ if he wishes. Iago’s final repetition of ‘put money in thy purse’ outlines his motivation for his actions, he needs Roderigo to keep it together in order to keep the mechanics of his plan adequately functioning.
In the ending soliloquy of the act, Iago introduces a second motive for his hatred of Othello, whilst outlining his plan and motivation. He states that it is common knowledge that the Moor 'twixt my sheets . . . [has] done my office’ (393-394) and, for Iago, ‘mere suspicion . . . will do . . . for surety’ (395-396). There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in the play to indicate that Othello has had an affair with Emilia, thus leading us to the conclusion that Iago must be mentally deranged in some manner, he is also unconcerned about this rumour. This point is emphasised further through ‘but for my sport and profit’, Iago is only doing this to satisfy his own sense of humour. Iago goes on to reveal his next malicious plan of action. As he is aware that Othello trusts him, he will use this trust to manipulate the Moor into believing that Cassio is ‘too familiar’ (402) with Desdemona, the moor’s ‘free and honest nature’ will allow him to do so. Othello has already revealed that he knows ‘little of this great world … [except that which] pertains to feats of broils and battle’ (86-87), so Iago plans to use this against him. He is also convinced his plan will bring him success as Cassio supposedly has the power to make all husbands jealous (‘framed to make women false’). The final couplet contains the reference ‘hell and night’ (409) and to ‘monstrous birth’ (410), here we sense Iago gleeful and Machiavellian; we see all too clearly the unnaturalness and the diabolical elements of his plans to destroy the union of Othello and Desdemona.









Wednesday, 27 January 2016

Othello initial Qs


  1. Iago and Roderigo wake Brababtio to inform him that his daughter has married the moor.
  2. Brabantio believes Othello won Desdemona by using magic.
  3. Othello believed he won Desdemona through the tales of his war victories.
  4. Othello appeared before the senate as they were under the assumption that he had abducted Desdemona because he is needed for a military decision.
  5. He was a slave in Africa.
  6. Othello is described as ‘the moor’ by his own wife. He is also called ‘more fair than black’.
  7. Brabantio’s rhyming couplet ‘Look to her, Moor, if thou hast eyes to see. She has deceived her father, and may thee’ gives a sense of foreboding for the audience because Othello is convinced by Lago that Desdemona does betray him and has an affair with Cassio.
  8. The dramatic irony is ‘my life upon her fate’ because Othello ends up killing Desdemona instead of protecting her.
  9. Iago persuades Roderigo to give him money.
  10. The audience/reader learns character traits of Iago; for example his spitefulness and manipulation, also his determination to seek revenge against Othello.

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Othello Act 1 Scene 1 Task



Act 1



1. How does Shakespeare present the world of Venice in the first act, and how does he construct the interactions of his central characters (Iago, Othello, and Desdemona) with that Venetian world and with each other. How are these interactions complicated by the fact that Othello is a Moor and that Desdemona is a young women?


2. What sort of person is Iago, as he appears in act 1? Are you satisfied by the reasons he gives for hating Othello? What is Iago's relationship with Roderigo?


3. What sort of language does Iago use? What sort of language does Othello use? What might be the significance of this difference?



1. Venice is depicted to be a relatively quiet and orderly place by Shakespeare. This is apparent in the first act as Barbantio is shocked at the idea of him being robbed; hence "What tellâst thou me of robbing? This is Venice; My house is not a grange." Shakespeare constructs the interactions of his central characters with the Venetian world as Roderigo's foolish behaviour would not be tolerated on the streets of Venice in the night; hence why Iago is quick to escape the scene before Barbantio and his guards appear outside. It would not be socially acceptable to awake (and insult) a powerful man without adequate reasoning in the Venetian world. The fact that Othello (moor) has now married Desdemona (young woman) causes complications as this would be frowned upon within society. Barbantio immediately tries to find an excuse for such a thing to occur by using the mention of 'witchcraft' to imply his daughter could not possibly be truly in love with a black man without being under some kind of spell.

2. In Act 1 Iago appears to be a false and cunning character. This is highlighted through the line 'I am not what I am' - Roderigo fails to recognise this as a warning. Iago himself even knows he has a dishonest soul as he states 'such a one do I profess myself'. We also learn here that he is very manipulative as causes chaos throughout the play, often by deceiving characters.
I don't believe Iago has satisfactory reasons for hating Othello, despite Othello promoting Cassio in his place when Iago wanted it and considered himself more superior than Cassio. Iago also believes Othello's relationship with his wife is illegal and he is not capable of being the spouse to such a beautiful and caring woman, predominantly because of his race. However, he should have overcome past indifferences with Othello and befriended him by now - Othello is undeserving of his fate.

Iago's relationship with Roderigo is merely bonded by their joint hate for Othello. Iago only uses Roderigo rather than aiming to be his companion - this is depicted by his soliloquy that summarises is attitude towards Roderigo 'thus do I ever make my fool my purse'. Roderigo is cleverly used by Iago as it is him who takes the blame for the shouting in the street, when in fact it is Iago who makes the most unpleasant and crude comments towards Barbantio.



3. Othello has such confidence in his skill with language at the beginning of the play, his pride becomes visible here as he is exceptionally proud of his achievements and his public stature. As well as this he is proud of his wife's affection for him, which he reiterates by saying how he would not give up their unique bond 'for the seas' worth'. Iago's duality is shown through his language as his tone changes between friendly and sour as soon as Othello moves away. Iago pretends to be supportive of Othello's marriage to Desdemona, but upon Cassio's arrival his uncomplimentary metaphor to describe the coupling suggests otherwise - 'he tonight hath boarded a land carack'. Iago's diction and metaphor choice here depict Othello as some kind of pirate whom is stealing Desdemona's love, while reducing Desdemona into a mere prize. The difference between the two characters language in this act may be a reflection of the difference in character traits shining through as Iago is cunning hence his duplicity, as opposed to Othello's confident and caring nature at first.

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

Classical Tragedy


Classical Tragedy

Classical tragedy preserves the unities -- one timespan, one setting, one story -- as they originated in the Greek theatre. It also defines a tragic plot as one with a royal character losing, through his own pride, a mighty prize. Modern tragedy redefines the genre, with ordinary protagonists, realistic timelines and settings, and multiple plots.

The genre of tragedy originates from ancient Greece. 5th century BCE Athens had a sophisticated theatrical culture.

Earliest examples of classical tragedies include;

Oedipus Rex – first performed in 429 BCE,

Prometheus Bound – first performed 430 BCE,

The Oresteia  - first performed 458 BCE,

Aristotle

Aristotle (384–322 B.C.E.) numbers among the greatest philosophers of all time. He was judged solely in terms of his philosophical influence. He was also sent to Athens and studied under Plato for 20 years. His work (through translation) became the basis of western education for centuries.

Aristotle wrote his study of tragedy entitled Poetics

Aristotle noted tragedies should excite the emotions of pity and fear by bringing about catharsis. Its action should be simple and complete; presenting a reversal of fortune. It should involve persons who are ‘held in great esteem’.

According to Aristotle there were 6 essential components of a tragedy;

Six main elements: plot, character, diction, thought, spectacle (scenic effect), and song (music), of which the first two are primary.

Aristotle goes on to discuss the structure of the ideal tragic plot and spends several chapters on its requirements. He says that the plot must be a complete whole — with a definite beginning, middle, and end — and its length should be such that the spectators can comprehend without difficulty both its separate parts and its overall unity. Moreover, the plot requires a single central theme in which all the elements are logically related to demonstrate the change in the protagonist's fortunes, with emphasis on the dramatic causation and probability of the events.

Aristotle has relatively less to say about the tragic hero because the incidents of tragedy are often beyond the hero's control or not closely related to his personality. The plot is intended to illustrate matters of cosmic rather than individual significance, and the protagonist is viewed primarily as the character who experiences the changes that take place. This stress placed by the Greek tragedians on the development of plot and action at the expense of character, and their general lack of interest in exploring psychological motivation, is one of the major differences between ancient and modern drama.

 

Since the aim of a tragedy is to arouse pity and fear through an alteration in the status of the central character, he must be a figure with whom the audience can identify and whose fate can trigger these emotions. Aristotle says that "pity is aroused by unmerited misfortune, fear by the misfortune of a man like ourselves." He surveys various possible types of characters on the basis of these premises, then defines the ideal protagonist as. . . a man who is highly renowned and prosperous, but one who is not pre-eminently virtuous and just, whose misfortune, however, is brought upon him not by vice or depravity but by some error of judgment or frailty; a personage like Oedipus.

Define the following elements/ingredients of Classical Tragedy:

1.Hamartia – the idea that the tragic hero makes a mistake- they cannot be someone who is completely all good or bad.

2.Tragic flaw - It is worth noting that some scholars believe the "flaw" was intended by Aristotle as a necessary corollary of his requirement that the hero should not be a completely admirable man.

3.Hubris – not listening to people and doing as you please anyway. A kind of excessive pride that causes the hero to ignore divine or important warnings, and to break moral codes. Thereby committing hamartia.

4.Peripeteia – opposite of hamartia; where the opposite of what was planned or hoped for by the protagonist takes place

5.Anagnorisis (recognition) - the point when the protagonist recognizes the truth of a situation, discovers another character's identity, or comes to a realization about himself. This sudden acquisition of knowledge or insight by the hero arouses the desired intense emotional reaction in the spectators.

6.Catharsis – should purge the pity and fear brought about by the tragic action being performed. The audience should feel content at the end and satisfied with how the plot ends.

Tuesday, 8 December 2015

Potential essay questions


J Peck and A Coyle state within Literary Terms and Criticisms ‘A crude Marxist might simply dismiss all literature as a bourgeois luxury in which middle-class authors write about their middle-class problems’.

To what extent do you agree with this statement in relation to Angela Carter’s A Bloody Chamber?

 

Pierre Macherey ‘stresses the gaps in a text, arguing that the reader can see what the text is hiding from itself’.

Using ideas from your critical anthology and Philip Larkin’s Whitsun Weddings collection of poems, to what extent do you agree with this view?

 

Larkin has been criticised of being "The Poet of Dirty Words" (Bert, Stephen May 2004) as he is concise in his language choice and depicts the miserable plight of the modern man.

Using ideas from your critical anthology and Philip Larkin’s Whitsun Weddings collection of poems, to what extent do you agree with this view?

New and improved Larkin essay


Philip Larkin

Larkin's poetry cynically portrays a society in which the proletariat "are deluding themselves" rather than presenting a hopeful picture of a society where "they [go] beyond the limits which society sets for them" To what extent do you agree with this statement? Make close reference to FOUR Larkin poems.

Philip Larkin’s ‘Whitsun Weddings’ collection (published in 1964) provides a host of examples of depictions in which the proletariat are deluding themselves. As opposed to exceeding society’s limits by breaking free of the consumerism that engulfs them into a sense of false consciousness. Larkin uses his cynicism and satiric stanzas to present an image to the reader of the capitalist society the proletariat inhabit.

Larkin attempts to create a relatable voice for the general public by using blunt, simplistic, often monosyllabic words in his poems. The opening lines of his poem ‘This Be The Verse’ provide a clear example of this. ‘They fuck you up, your mum and dad’ is concise and consolidates the purpose of his poem quickly. The use of ‘fuck you up’ is very uncommon within the realms of poetry; colloquial language has connotations with informality from critics, therefore deeming it inadequate to be categorised as high literature.  Burt, Stephen stated on 27th May 2004 that Larkin was "The Poet of Dirty Words" perhaps because of his unique qualities when expressing himself without trying to moderate his language choices. Within this poem Larkin exposes the continuous circle of children inheriting their parents’ bad habits, despite how much they attempt to avoid it. Children tend to emulate their parents; causing a legacy of defects. It could be argued that Larkin goes on to offer an escape of the blame in lines 5-8 as current parents have only acquired their parents’ bad habits too, highlighting the universal tradition that isn’t necessarily down to personal fault. ‘Old-style hats and coats’ alludes to those of previous generations (e.g. parents/grandparents) – showing this collective blame on the history of all parents. Alternatively, it could be seen that ‘Old-style hats and coats’ offers an alternative reading as hats and coats may reflect wealth and power of the past generations of bourgeois. It is this group that have ‘fucked up’ the current proletariat who Larkin aims his poems at, and their fate is inevitable due the inequalities within the capitalist society, and the power the bourgeoisie possesses.  Although Larkin offers a form of escapism of the blame for the proletariat he makes it evident they constantly are accepting of the status quo and fail to disentangle themselves from the monotonous day to day routine they live by – this therefore agrees with the initial statement; illustrating their delusion. This work of Larkin’s contradicts the marxist view that it is inevitable that society will evolve into socialism due to the repetitive qualities within the poem. The influx of generations simply repeating themselves allows no opportunity for potential change, thus concluding that capitalism will dominate the lifestyle of populations for generations to come. Larkin’s ideas and works are not ‘internally inconsistent’ (Paul Sweezy) as critics argue Marx is  – Larkin’s cynicism empowers him and reflects a deliberate ploy by the controlling bourgeoisie to create a sense of futility and despondency in attempt to make the proletariat remain docile and compliant. This is necessary for the bourgeoisie as their puppets (the proletariat) need to be under complete control at all times in order to withhold the superstructure.

This idea of monotony within the lives of the proletariat is maintained throughout several of Larkin’s works. Larkin’s background of deriving from a middle class family and going on to acquire three years of education at Oxford University allowed him to discover the repetitive lifestyle of the lower classes. Another poem in which this is demonstrated is ‘The Large Cool Store’. The predominant impression the poem gives is that there is a clear inequality between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The working class desire to gain the lifestyle of the bourgeois class by aiming to dress in a similar sense to them, however, they fail to realise some similar styled clothes do not escape their day to day ‘drab’ lives and they will never gain the equality they desire.  A repetitive, monotonous society is exemplified through the description of the store. Similarly, simplistic language is used here which reflects the monotonous lives of the proletariat – predominantly the use of monosyllabic words are used to evoke the look and feel of department stores.  This use of dull language reflects the empty, materialistic workers that shop there. In this poem the proletariat are, again, deluding themselves as they delve into a sense of false consciousness by believing they will appear equal to the upper class by dressing in a similar way to them. This therefore agrees with the initial statement again as the workers fail to exceed the boundaries higher realms of authority have set for them.

Similarly, in the poem ‘Sunny Prestatyn’ the concept of purchasing something in attempt to gain and reflect your authority or equality is used here, as it is in The Large Cool Store. Advertisements are used to delude to lower class into believing that by buying something, they will achieve a better quality of life as a result. Larkin essentially explores social discontent and aspects of society’s mental and social brutality. The girl who appears on the poster for example (advertising this holiday destination) is vandalised despite not doing anything wrong; reflecting the uncaring world Larkin depicts. She is initially presented as a happy figure due to ‘laughed the girl on the poster’ and persuades the audience that they too will achieve happiness by visiting this holiday destination. Thus illustrating how the working class are led to believe, by adverts created by the bourgeois class, that if power is what they desire within society they must obtain the materialistic items that the bourgeoisie has deemed acceptable for them to own. However, this is merely a sense of false consciousness that has been developed by the proletariat – similar to theme presented in The Large Cool Store, buying these items only strengthens the authority of the bourgeois, and merely wastes the little disposable income the working class have access too, as opposed to gaining them any form of personal power. A man’s status within society is of utmost importance, it is evident Marx supports this as in his foreword to his 1859 Towards a Critique of Political Economy he states ‘It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness’. This consolidates the ideology that regardless of the mental strength of a person, if they do not belong to the ‘elite’ class (bourgeoisie) their talents are rendered useless as they cannot ever be respected in the same way an upper class member of society would be treated. In contrast to this, a myriad of readers believe the use of ‘laughed the girl’ is a reflection of the bourgeoisie physically humouring themselves at the belittling and exploitation of the proletariat. The proletariat are unaware of the dominative figures in society oppressing them, and so they continue in conducting their monotonous daily lives completely oblivious to the unequal system that forces them into having this lifestyle of full time, hard, manual labour. This point still however supports the statement in relation to the proletariat ‘deluding themselves’.

The theme of exploitation can also be argued to arise in more of Larkin’s poems. Mr Bleaney for example creates the idea of the proletariat being puppets owned, and controlled by the bourgeoisie. This idea of puppets derives from the dehumanising that occurs within the poem as Mr Bleaney’s character is merely represented as a body. Subsequently, Mr Bleaney is lacking characteristics or life which can be supported by the fact ‘Mr Bleaney remained in the room until 'they moved him'’ – he simply cannot function without the oppressive bourgeois controlling him as Mr Bleaney (representing the proletariat) has never known anything different. Larkin predominantly uses irony within this poem in order to depict the miserable plight of the modern man. Similarly his colloquial language (as seen in This Be The Verse) features in this poem, examples include ‘frigid wind’. This tone gives the poem an intimate, conversational feel. The enjambment used could also reflect the on-going, never ceasing nature of life. The nature of life for the proletariat however is repetitive, as seen in The Large Cool Store, Philip Larkin expresses the empty, monotonous and boring lifestyle Mr Bleaney had once lived. The ABAB rhyming scheme conveys a regular pattern, which is supported further by "I know his habbits" depicting a regular, mundane lifestyle. This lack of activity could be seen to be reflected within Mr Bleaney’s opinions; "Flowered curtains, thin and frayed fall to within five incges of the sill, whose window shows a strip of building land". His view is boring as is his lifestyle; both lack potential to achieve anything worthy of credit in the world due to his societal position. This could relate to Bertens’ idea from Literary Theory: The Basics stating ‘capitalism alienates them (labourers) from themselves by seeing them in terms of production… Capitalism turns people into things, it reifies them’. By reifying a human being and diminishing a form of human life into merely an object it becomes evident that this being will lack personality and the ability to form an opinion of their own. This quality is recognised within Mr Bleaney, The Large Cool store, This Be The Verse and Sunny Prestatyn as the proletariat continually fail to break free of the boundaries society sets for them. Bertens goes on to say ‘in our mind we can always be free. Wrong, says Marxism, minds aren’t free at all, they only think they are’. Thus supporting the ideology highlighted in the initial statement that the proletariat are in fact deluding themselves, as they are constantly entrapped by their own false consciousness which blinds them from the inequalities within society.